It was another special edition at TFT Central this afternoon when Jett had his first experience of ‘Jaws’, and I saw it in a cinema for the first time, having grown up afraid of swimming due to repeated pan-and-scan broadcasts on probably all four of the terrestrial channels granted me in childhood, but never having the opportunity to see it projected on a canvas large enough to do it justice. Jett may, I am sure, refer to it on upcoming episode 97, but I was struck by his suggestion that the story of Roy, Ricky, Bob and the shark is a Holocaust film in disguise – evoked by the the city fathers’ refusal to acknowledge the danger, the fleeing of the powerless bathers from the sea, the conversation about the delivery of the A-Bomb, and, perhaps most Freudian of all, the fact that gas is used to kill. As is often the case, my co-host impressed with his mysterious ability to find things in movies that no one has said before, or that at least don’t show up on the first page of a Google search. I’m fascinated by his suggestion that the most obvious analogue to ‘Jaws’ in Spielberg’s work may be ‘Schindler’s List’, and I’m sure we’ll talk about this on the show.
It dovetails with the fact that, for me, ‘Jaws’ has become the archetypal film for representing the meaning of violence in our shared culture – there are obvious parallels between the death of the shark and the origin of the myth that order can be brought out of chaos by the application of more chaos found in ‘The Epic of Gilgamesh’. In ‘Jaws’, paradise is restored through ultimate force; in that regard it looks like the story that catechises pop culture, unquestioned. So it’s troubling, and philosophically compelling. It also happens to be crafted from a rock that looks to me like the secret headquarters of perfect film grammar; so it’s an utterly compelling, character-rich tale, which genuinely deserves TFT’s traditional tagline of ‘action-filled, adrenaline-fuelled thrill ride’.
I leave you with three questions:
1: What other films do you, the TFT community consider to be philosophically deeper than their reputation would suggest?
2: What films other films can you think of that end with the opposite of the climax in ‘Jaws’, with a negotiated settlement rather than killing the bad guy?
3: Where did Murray Hamilton (below) get his jackets? And does anyone know if you can buy them in Tennessee or North Carolina?

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gareth Higgins, Douglas Pritchard. Douglas Pritchard said: RT @thefilmtalk: Movie News:: The Teeth of Gilgamesh http://bit.ly/3RcN2k. re JAWs & holocaust theory,any Spielberg comment? [...]
Spice it up with a bit of Lacan, Derrida and the inevitable Zizek and “Jaws” will become “Jews” or sumthin
That may be the first time anyone has compared my thinking to that of Žižek – I'm flattered.
I think.
Question 1 would take some thinking for me – to suggest a film has a deeper subtext than the film's reputation suggests requires a director who has the capability to accomplish this. Spielberg is one of few who can and has crossed the genre of “summer blockbuster” to a movie with a more serious message.
#2 is tough as well. The only thing I can think of right now is “No Country For Old Men”. While having Anton Sigr walk off by giving $100 to a boy for his shirt and an agreement to say he was “already gone” isn't exactly a “negotiated settlement” – it's the only movie I can think of right now where the villain didn't get blown away and the movie had an anti-climactic end.
As for #3, go to any UNC Tarheel football or basketball game. I'm sure you'll see a jacket very similar.
Spice it up with a bit of Lacan, Derrida and the inevitable Zizek and “Jaws” will become “Jews” or sumthin
That may be the first time anyone has compared my thinking to that of Žižek – I'm flattered.
I think.
Question 1 would take some thinking for me – to suggest a film has a deeper subtext than the film's reputation suggests requires a director who has the capability to accomplish this. Spielberg is one of few who can and has crossed the genre of “summer blockbuster” to a movie with a more serious message.
#2 is tough as well. The only thing I can think of right now is “No Country For Old Men”. While having Anton Sigr walk off by giving $100 to a boy for his shirt and an agreement to say he was “already gone” isn't exactly a “negotiated settlement” – it's the only movie I can think of right now where the villain didn't get blown away and the movie had an anti-climactic end.
As for #3, go to any UNC Tarheel football or basketball game. I'm sure you'll see a jacket very similar.