At the start of every week’s show my voice proclaims during the title sequence that Tarkovsky’s ‘Andrei Rublev’ is the best film ever made.
That sounds a bit limiting though – I’ll go further and say it’s one of the greatest of all artworks – and feeling the way I do about it I’ll have no choice but to suspend my self-imposed monastic ways and introduce the film this Sunday as it plays on the big screen, 12pm and 6pm at the Belcourt here in Nashville.
Now, if you’ve never seen an film by Andrei Tarkovsky you really should.
Watching ‘Andrei Rublev’ one begins to realise that we haven’t even begun to scratch the surface of what cinema can do. This summer’s dire crop of films may seem to imply that the filmic art form is [played out/worn out] – but that’s not the case – so many recent films are actually dire because their ‘tricks’ are worn out – they’ve got nowhere to go; for you see, contemporary commercial cinema is all about what happens next, (do we have Hitchcock to blame for this – the focus on tension and suspense aka when’s the next cut coming? hmmm), whereas Tarkovsky’s films are about the now.
That’s why ‘Andrei Rublev’ feels as if it’s actually shot on location in the 15th Century. It’s not constrained by the need to [impress/divert] using the standard grammar of cinema that dictates novelty – it is content to allow the viewer to live in the space it’s photographing.
If you’re not prepared for this Tarkovsky’s films this can seem boring – it’s understandable if you’re used to the ‘what happens next’ form of cinema – but if you allow yourself to be in the now – to be in the frame – in the place and time of the film then you’re in for some thing extraordinary.
Listen to Tarkovsky’s advice to young people – given in Donatella Baglivo’s documentary ‘Andrei Tarkovsky, Poet of the Cinema’:
Learn to love solitude – to be more alone with yourselves. The problem with young people is their carrying out noisy and aggressive actions not to feel lonely – and this is a sad thing – the individual must learn to be on his own as a child – for this doesn’t mean to be alone: it means not get bored with oneself which is a various dangerous symptom, almost a disease.
The same can be said for much of widely seen cinema. Current films would be so much more effective if they were less aggressive, less worried about gaining attention and allowed themselves the time to unfold, and discover their own internal rhythm, design and spirit.
- – -
Ok, that’s enough highfalutin’ talk – hope to see you at the Belcourt this Sunday:
‘Andrei Rublev’ at the Belcourt / Showtimes and Directions
If you’d like to find out more about Tarkovsky’s work I recommend this podcast, an interview Gareth and I did with Dmitry Trakovsky, director of ‘Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky’:
The Film Talk – Part 74 – Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky
I have this movie in my Queue, and from the talking up it's gotten from Jett, I can't wait to see it. Having just rewatched Tarkovsky's Solaris/Solyaris (I never know which way to spell it), I feel that I've finally reached the age, that his films actually kind of make sense to me and that I can at least subconsciously absorb what he's saying (oddly, I feel the same way about Kubrick, and especially after recently watching Barry Lyndon, for the first time).
But, the reason I wanted to reply, is because of that quote of Tarkovsky's. That's amazing, and strangely how I've lived my life. I love being alone – I'm fun at parties and bah mitzvah's too, but enjoy solitude. And I completely agree that more people should spend more time just with themselves.
And, of course, once again I'm jealous that I don't have the Belcourt here. :)
I have this movie in my Queue, and from the talking up it's gotten from Jett, I can't wait to see it. Having just rewatched Tarkovsky's Solaris/Solyaris (I never know which way to spell it), I feel that I've finally reached the age, that his films actually kind of make sense to me and that I can at least subconsciously absorb what he's saying (oddly, I feel the same way about Kubrick, and especially after recently watching Barry Lyndon, for the first time).
But, the reason I wanted to reply, is because of that quote of Tarkovsky's. That's amazing, and strangely how I've lived my life. I love being alone – I'm fun at parties and bah mitzvah's too, but enjoy solitude. And I completely agree that more people should spend more time just with themselves.
And, of course, once again I'm jealous that I don't have the Belcourt here. :)
[...] ‘Andrei Rublev’ this Sunday and Monday at the Belcourt [...]
[...] as it doesn’t seem to be enough – meaning that right now I’m either into seeing films that are masterpieces, (those that transcend their genre to become lasting works of art), or pics that are [...]