<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Less is More: Or How to Make Your Films More Interesting with the Help of the Easy Surreal</title> <atom:link href="http://thefilmtalk.com/2009/09/15/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3011</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:36:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3011</guid> <description>who knows who did the cutting, (&quot;Their are two kinds of editors my friend&quot;, etc.), all I know is the effect - and you&#039;re right of course re: seeing one version multiple times, (i mentioned that at the top of the post - it&#039;s tough - a first love)...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ yes, with the dubbing all of sudden Clint went into a time machine and was confronted with the guy from Gran Torino - oh well, any Good the Bad is better than no Good the Bad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who knows who did the cutting, (&#8220;Their are two kinds of editors my friend&#8221;, etc.), all I know is the effect &#8211; and you&#39;re right of course re: seeing one version multiple times, (i mentioned that at the top of the post &#8211; it&#39;s tough &#8211; a first love)&#8230;</p><p>+ yes, with the dubbing all of sudden Clint went into a time machine and was confronted with the guy from Gran Torino &#8211; oh well, any Good the Bad is better than no Good the Bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d-man</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3010</link> <dc:creator>d-man</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:01:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3010</guid> <description>The thing is, the Italian cinematic version of the film would hypothetically the Leone-endorsed version, right? And that&#039;s the long one....and the original version!? Or not?? Who knows if Leone even did any of the cutting for the US version?  Unfortunately, what killed the &quot;restored&quot; version for me was the newly performed dubbing of the scenes which had been cut for the US release - it just didn&#039;t fit in with the rest....or is it just that I, like you, saw the US version so many times, it&#039;s extremely difficult to experience the changes??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, the Italian cinematic version of the film would hypothetically the Leone-endorsed version, right? And that&#39;s the long one&#8230;.and the original version!? Or not?? Who knows if Leone even did any of the cutting for the US version?  Unfortunately, what killed the &#8220;restored&#8221; version for me was the newly performed dubbing of the scenes which had been cut for the US release &#8211; it just didn&#39;t fit in with the rest&#8230;.or is it just that I, like you, saw the US version so many times, it&#39;s extremely difficult to experience the changes??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3012</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3012</guid> <description>I really didn&#039;t care for the &quot;Redux&quot; version of Apocalypse Now, probably due to the reasons you&#039;ve discussed.  Though I suppose originally Copolla wanted the Redux version, he really did make a better film, in my opinion, without the added footage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#39;t care for the &#8220;Redux&#8221; version of Apocalypse Now, probably due to the reasons you&#39;ve discussed.  Though I suppose originally Copolla wanted the Redux version, he really did make a better film, in my opinion, without the added footage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bindlestiff</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3015</link> <dc:creator>bindlestiff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:30:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3015</guid> <description>hahahha not really...just being &#039;engaged&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;off to see district 9 tonight....but thats another story!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahha not really&#8230;just being &#39;engaged&#39;</p><p>off to see district 9 tonight&#8230;.but thats another story!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3014</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:04:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3014</guid> <description>wow - you&#039;re having a bad day :) i&#039;ll limit my comments to what i said on the show :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8211; you&#39;re having a bad day :) i&#39;ll limit my comments to what i said on the show :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bindlestiff</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3013</link> <dc:creator>bindlestiff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:37:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3013</guid> <description>I don&#039;t understand the term great american movie, or to be precise I have no interest in it as a useful term of critical analysis. Its also not specific enough to be anything other than confusing. Great movie about &#039;america&#039; or a great movie by an american citizen? Either way film study has moved on from schoolboy (or girl) lists of best and worst? Hasn&#039;t it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand the term great american movie, or to be precise I have no interest in it as a useful term of critical analysis. Its also not specific enough to be anything other than confusing. Great movie about &#39;america&#39; or a great movie by an american citizen? Either way film study has moved on from schoolboy (or girl) lists of best and worst? Hasn&#39;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3009</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:36:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3009</guid> <description>who knows who did the cutting, (&quot;Their are two kinds of editors my friend&quot;, etc.), all I know is the effect - and you&#039;re right of course re: seeing one version multiple times, (i mentioned that at the top of the post - it&#039;s tough - a first love)...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ yes, with the dubbing all of sudden Clint went into a time machine and was confronted with the guy from Gran Torino - oh well, any Good the Bad is better than no Good the Bad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who knows who did the cutting, (&#8220;Their are two kinds of editors my friend&#8221;, etc.), all I know is the effect &#8211; and you&#39;re right of course re: seeing one version multiple times, (i mentioned that at the top of the post &#8211; it&#39;s tough &#8211; a first love)&#8230;</p><p>+ yes, with the dubbing all of sudden Clint went into a time machine and was confronted with the guy from Gran Torino &#8211; oh well, any Good the Bad is better than no Good the Bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d-man</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3008</link> <dc:creator>d-man</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3008</guid> <description>The thing is, the Italian cinematic version of the film would hypothetically the Leone-endorsed version, right? And that&#039;s the long one....and the original version!? Or not?? Who knows if Leone even did any of the cutting for the US version?  Unfortunately, what killed the &quot;restored&quot; version for me was the newly performed dubbing of the scenes which had been cut for the US release - it just didn&#039;t fit in with the rest....or is it just that I, like you, saw the US version so many times, it&#039;s extremely difficult to experience the changes??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, the Italian cinematic version of the film would hypothetically the Leone-endorsed version, right? And that&#39;s the long one&#8230;.and the original version!? Or not?? Who knows if Leone even did any of the cutting for the US version?  Unfortunately, what killed the &#8220;restored&#8221; version for me was the newly performed dubbing of the scenes which had been cut for the US release &#8211; it just didn&#39;t fit in with the rest&#8230;.or is it just that I, like you, saw the US version so many times, it&#39;s extremely difficult to experience the changes??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3007</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3007</guid> <description>I really didn&#039;t care for the &quot;Redux&quot; version of Apocalypse Now, probably due to the topic you&#039;ve discussed.  Though I suppose originally Copolla wanted the Redux version, he really did make a better film, in my opinion, without the added footage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#39;t care for the &#8220;Redux&#8221; version of Apocalypse Now, probably due to the topic you&#39;ve discussed.  Though I suppose originally Copolla wanted the Redux version, he really did make a better film, in my opinion, without the added footage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bindlestiff</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/less-is-more-or-how-to-make-your-films-more-interesting-with-the-help-of-the-easy-surreal/#comment-3006</link> <dc:creator>bindlestiff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=3455#comment-3006</guid> <description>hahahha not really...just being &#039;engaged&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;off to see district 9 tonight....but thats another story!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahha not really&#8230;just being &#39;engaged&#39;</p><p>off to see district 9 tonight&#8230;.but thats another story!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: thefilmtalk.com @ 2012-05-23 00:44:56 -->
