<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Film Talk &#8211; Part 69 &#8211; Up / Anvil! / The Hangover</title> <atom:link href="http://thefilmtalk.com/2009/06/06/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Are DUE DATE &#38; PLANES, TRAINS, &#38; AUTOMOBILES the Same Film? &#124; The Film Talk - Movie Review Podcast</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-11024</link> <dc:creator>Are DUE DATE &#38; PLANES, TRAINS, &#38; AUTOMOBILES the Same Film? &#124; The Film Talk - Movie Review Podcast</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:56:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-11024</guid> <description>[...] Last year&#8217;s THE HANGOVER was a fun film with a lot of heart. (Check out the Film Talk review here.) But every outrageous gag in DUE DATE feels like a calculated lunge at the target demographic. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last year&#8217;s THE HANGOVER was a fun film with a lot of heart. (Check out the Film Talk review here.) But every outrageous gag in DUE DATE feels like a calculated lunge at the target demographic. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009: Climaxes</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2602</link> <dc:creator>The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009: Climaxes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2602</guid> <description>[...] ‘Gojira’ exclamation by Steve &#8216;Lips&#8217; Kudlow at the end of ‘Anvil’ – the only heavy metal documentary that will make you cry (let me grant the fact that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Gojira’ exclamation by Steve &#8216;Lips&#8217; Kudlow at the end of ‘Anvil’ – the only heavy metal documentary that will make you cry (let me grant the fact that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Movie of the Year 2009: Climaxes &#171; god is not elsewhere / some conversation about movies, art, politics and spirituality with gareth higgins</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2601</link> <dc:creator>The Movie of the Year 2009: Climaxes &#171; god is not elsewhere / some conversation about movies, art, politics and spirituality with gareth higgins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:01:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2601</guid> <description>[...] ‘Gojira’ exclamation by Steve &#8216;Lips&#8217; Kudlow at the end of ‘Anvil’ – the only heavy metal documentary that will make you cry (let me grant the fact that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Gojira’ exclamation by Steve &#8216;Lips&#8217; Kudlow at the end of ‘Anvil’ – the only heavy metal documentary that will make you cry (let me grant the fact that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009: Overtures</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2600</link> <dc:creator>The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009: Overtures</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:59:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2600</guid> <description>[...] first section of ‘Up’, which I saw a few weeks before my own wedding in May, the most glorious animation and design fused [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first section of ‘Up’, which I saw a few weeks before my own wedding in May, the most glorious animation and design fused [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Movie of the Year: Overtures &#171; god is not elsewhere / some conversation about movies, art, politics and spirituality with gareth higgins</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2599</link> <dc:creator>The Movie of the Year: Overtures &#171; god is not elsewhere / some conversation about movies, art, politics and spirituality with gareth higgins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:16:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2599</guid> <description>[...] first section of ‘Up’, which I saw a few weeks before my own wedding in May, the most glorious animation and design fused [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first section of ‘Up’, which I saw a few weeks before my own wedding in May, the most glorious animation and design fused [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2598</link> <dc:creator>The Film Talk &#187; The Movie of the Year 2009</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:16:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2598</guid> <description>[...] guy gets his world back by letting go of a balloon-powered [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guy gets his world back by letting go of a balloon-powered [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StanleyRumm</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2603</link> <dc:creator>StanleyRumm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2603</guid> <description>I&#039;ve only managed to see UP yesterday -and I forget most of the points made in the podcast since I heard it weeks ago, but to my mind the movie suffers from the same plot-disintegration that killed Wall-E and all Pixar movies since (and including) The Incredibiles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As with Wall-E especially, UP begins extremely well (if a little downbeat for youngsters), but once it goes up, it&#039;s quickly down down down all the way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s like the committee writing the script gave up after lunch. I can imagine the chairman straightening his notes at the head of the table saying &quot;OK, so we got to the point where they land on Paradise Falls... what now?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Oh! oh! I know!&quot; pipes up an enterprising Pixar member, &quot;I heard of this great auto-scipt device as revealed by Jett Loe in his review of The Wrestler! ..We&#039;ve already awed and wowed the audience enough -let&#039;s switch that on and get to work on the visuals!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Great idea number 27! Next time around you get to direct!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s that you say? Only a kids&#039; movie? Why is that an excuse?&lt;br&gt;Any movie or story needs to be true to itself if it&#039;s to hold water, if it&#039;s to be taken as &#039;as-great-as-these-movies-purport-to-be-trying-to-be&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This one gave up. Maybe that&#039;s the reason for the title.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you like to know The SECRET OF PIXAR!? Really? Well, OK, here it is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come up with an interesting, kinda mad notion in one or two sentences. Now spend the rest of the plot working it back to a predictable formula, ending in a half hour chase, preferably with 5 minute Jesus-Resurrection sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exercise: &quot;A slipper is stolen from a shoe shop by a one-legged thief.&quot; &lt;br&gt;Now that you know the plot, add the Disintegration Formula and you have a GUARANTEED HIT! Expectations have been lowered so much it&#039;s like taking candy from a baby. They&#039;ll lap it up like a sequel to a loud robot movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Up isn&#039;t as bad as Wall-E of course. I liked a lot of it. But nowhere near what kids deserve. Or me for that matter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve only managed to see UP yesterday -and I forget most of the points made in the podcast since I heard it weeks ago, but to my mind the movie suffers from the same plot-disintegration that killed Wall-E and all Pixar movies since (and including) The Incredibiles.</p><p>As with Wall-E especially, UP begins extremely well (if a little downbeat for youngsters), but once it goes up, it&#39;s quickly down down down all the way.</p><p>It&#39;s like the committee writing the script gave up after lunch. I can imagine the chairman straightening his notes at the head of the table saying &#8220;OK, so we got to the point where they land on Paradise Falls&#8230; what now?&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Oh! oh! I know!&#8221; pipes up an enterprising Pixar member, &#8220;I heard of this great auto-scipt device as revealed by Jett Loe in his review of The Wrestler! ..We&#39;ve already awed and wowed the audience enough -let&#39;s switch that on and get to work on the visuals!&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Great idea number 27! Next time around you get to direct!&#8221;</p><p>What&#39;s that you say? Only a kids&#39; movie? Why is that an excuse?<br />Any movie or story needs to be true to itself if it&#39;s to hold water, if it&#39;s to be taken as &#39;as-great-as-these-movies-purport-to-be-trying-to-be&#39;.</p><p>This one gave up. Maybe that&#39;s the reason for the title.</p><p>Would you like to know The SECRET OF PIXAR!? Really? Well, OK, here it is:</p><p>Come up with an interesting, kinda mad notion in one or two sentences. Now spend the rest of the plot working it back to a predictable formula, ending in a half hour chase, preferably with 5 minute Jesus-Resurrection sequence.</p><p>Exercise: &#8220;A slipper is stolen from a shoe shop by a one-legged thief.&#8221; <br />Now that you know the plot, add the Disintegration Formula and you have a GUARANTEED HIT! Expectations have been lowered so much it&#39;s like taking candy from a baby. They&#39;ll lap it up like a sequel to a loud robot movie.</p><p>Up isn&#39;t as bad as Wall-E of course. I liked a lot of it. But nowhere near what kids deserve. Or me for that matter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StanleyRumm</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2597</link> <dc:creator>StanleyRumm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:04:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2597</guid> <description>I&#039;ve only managed to see UP yesterday -and I forget most of the points made in the podcast since I heard it weeks ago, but to my mind the movie suffers from the same plot-disintegration that killed Wall-E and all Pixar movies since (and including) The Incredibiles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As with Wall-E especially, UP begins extremely well (if a little downbeat for youngsters), but once it goes up, it&#039;s quickly down down down all the way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s like the committee writing the script gave up after lunch. I can imagine the chairman straightening his notes at the head of the table saying &quot;OK, so we got to the point where they land on Paradise Falls... what now?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Oh! oh! I know!&quot; pipes up an enterprising Pixar member, &quot;I heard of this great auto-scipt device as revealed by Jett Loe in his review of The Wrestler! ..We&#039;ve already awed and wowed the audience enough -let&#039;s switch that on and get to work on the visuals!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Great idea number 27! Next time around you get to direct!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s that you say? Only a kids&#039; movie? Why is that an excuse?&lt;br&gt;Any movie or story needs to be true to itself if it&#039;s to hold water, if it&#039;s to be taken as &#039;as-great-as-these-movies-purport-to-be-trying-to-be&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This one gave up. Maybe that&#039;s the reason for the title.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you like to know The SECRET OF PIXAR!? Really? Well, OK, here it is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come up with an interesting, kinda mad notion in one or two sentences. Now spend the rest of the plot working it back to a predictable formula, ending in a half hour chase, preferably with 5 minute Jesus-Resurrection sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exercise: &quot;A slipper is stolen from a shoe shop by a one-legged thief.&quot; &lt;br&gt;Now that you know the plot, add the Disintegration Formula and you have a GUARANTEED HIT! Expectations have been lowered so much it&#039;s like taking candy from a baby. They&#039;ll lap it up like a sequel to a loud robot movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Up isn&#039;t as bad as Wall-E of course. I liked a lot of it. But nowhere near what kids deserve. Or me for that matter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve only managed to see UP yesterday -and I forget most of the points made in the podcast since I heard it weeks ago, but to my mind the movie suffers from the same plot-disintegration that killed Wall-E and all Pixar movies since (and including) The Incredibiles.</p><p>As with Wall-E especially, UP begins extremely well (if a little downbeat for youngsters), but once it goes up, it&#39;s quickly down down down all the way.</p><p>It&#39;s like the committee writing the script gave up after lunch. I can imagine the chairman straightening his notes at the head of the table saying &#8220;OK, so we got to the point where they land on Paradise Falls&#8230; what now?&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Oh! oh! I know!&#8221; pipes up an enterprising Pixar member, &#8220;I heard of this great auto-scipt device as revealed by Jett Loe in his review of The Wrestler! ..We&#39;ve already awed and wowed the audience enough -let&#39;s switch that on and get to work on the visuals!&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Great idea number 27! Next time around you get to direct!&#8221;</p><p>What&#39;s that you say? Only a kids&#39; movie? Why is that an excuse?<br />Any movie or story needs to be true to itself if it&#39;s to hold water, if it&#39;s to be taken as &#39;as-great-as-these-movies-purport-to-be-trying-to-be&#39;.</p><p>This one gave up. Maybe that&#39;s the reason for the title.</p><p>Would you like to know The SECRET OF PIXAR!? Really? Well, OK, here it is:</p><p>Come up with an interesting, kinda mad notion in one or two sentences. Now spend the rest of the plot working it back to a predictable formula, ending in a half hour chase, preferably with 5 minute Jesus-Resurrection sequence.</p><p>Exercise: &#8220;A slipper is stolen from a shoe shop by a one-legged thief.&#8221; <br />Now that you know the plot, add the Disintegration Formula and you have a GUARANTEED HIT! Expectations have been lowered so much it&#39;s like taking candy from a baby. They&#39;ll lap it up like a sequel to a loud robot movie.</p><p>Up isn&#39;t as bad as Wall-E of course. I liked a lot of it. But nowhere near what kids deserve. Or me for that matter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2596</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2596</guid> <description>Ah yes! Your point about the Die Hard score makes perfect sense, think I always picked up essence of Aliens at that moment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually Kamen&#039;s DH score is great, I love his use of Beethoven&#039;s 9th in the film. Did you notice how his use of sleigh bells is also employed in his other Christmas movie - Brazil? It&#039;s such a shame he&#039;s gone, I really liked his stuff.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes! Your point about the Die Hard score makes perfect sense, think I always picked up essence of Aliens at that moment.</p><p>Actually Kamen&#39;s DH score is great, I love his use of Beethoven&#39;s 9th in the film. Did you notice how his use of sleigh bells is also employed in his other Christmas movie &#8211; Brazil? It&#39;s such a shame he&#39;s gone, I really liked his stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/podcast-review-up-the-hangover-anvil/#comment-2595</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:37:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2510#comment-2595</guid> <description>Horner Giacchino Williams</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horner Giacchino Williams</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: thefilmtalk.com @ 2012-02-08 13:48:22 -->
