<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: This Week&#039;s Podcast: &#039;Star Trek&#039; &#8211; Including TFT+</title> <atom:link href="http://thefilmtalk.com/2009/05/09/star-trek-podcast-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2412</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:53:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2412</guid> <description>I&#039;m a big fan of Limmy but think he&#039;s on the wrong track here - as he states he was expecting the standard &#039;prequel&#039; = &#039;filling in the back story&#039; on the characters - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that would have been a mistake = no suspense = we know how everything is going to turn out - by changing the timeline = suspense and DRAMA has been added = a brilliant stroke! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a big fan of Limmy but think he&#39;s on the wrong track here &#8211; as he states he was expecting the standard &#39;prequel&#39; = &#39;filling in the back story&#39; on the characters &#8211;</p><p>I think that would have been a mistake = no suspense = we know how everything is going to turn out &#8211; by changing the timeline = suspense and DRAMA has been added = a brilliant stroke! :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shannon McClean</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2411</link> <dc:creator>Shannon McClean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:12:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2411</guid> <description>Jett, have you seen Limmy&#039;s take on Star Trek?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jett, have you seen Limmy&#39;s take on Star Trek?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2410</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:53:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2410</guid> <description>I&#039;m a big fan of Limmy but think he&#039;s on the wrong track here - as he states he was expecting the standard &#039;prequel&#039; = &#039;filling in the back story&#039; on the characters - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that would have been a mistake = no suspense = we know how everything is going to turn out - by changing the timeline = suspense and DRAMA has been added = a brilliant stroke! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a big fan of Limmy but think he&#39;s on the wrong track here &#8211; as he states he was expecting the standard &#39;prequel&#39; = &#39;filling in the back story&#39; on the characters &#8211;</p><p>I think that would have been a mistake = no suspense = we know how everything is going to turn out &#8211; by changing the timeline = suspense and DRAMA has been added = a brilliant stroke! :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shannon McClean</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2409</link> <dc:creator>Shannon McClean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:12:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2409</guid> <description>Jett, have you seen Limmy&#039;s take on Star Trek?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jett, have you seen Limmy&#39;s take on Star Trek?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjckbAqUwT0</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2408</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2408</guid> <description>Ok, so I&#039;ve paid up - how long is it before the bonus podcast turns up in my e-mail?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven&#039;t heard the show yet, but have seen the film and thought I&#039;d put some random thoughts out there because I&#039;m occasionally swayed by what Jett and Gareth say. So here goes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Terrific fun, was sucked in by the pace, characters and humour.&lt;br&gt;Felt like a very Abrams thing to do by beginning the film with an emotional puch, just like M:I 3, but I fell for it.&lt;br&gt;Was suprised they decided to use material from the last Trek, i.e. Romulan hell bent on revenge driving a huge ship resembling an insect.&lt;br&gt;Why do so many of these films have to deal in HUGE senarios involving planet sized death and the threat of Earth&#039;s total destruction? Just as many thrills can be had on a smaller scale, i.e. Wrath of Khan.&lt;br&gt;Shame about revenge being the motivation of the &#039;bad guy&#039;. Only thing I think let the whole thing down.&lt;br&gt;Did I say how much fun I had?&lt;br&gt;Sorry if you&#039;ve said these things already guys. Had to get these down without being under the influence!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so I&#39;ve paid up &#8211; how long is it before the bonus podcast turns up in my e-mail?</p><p>Haven&#39;t heard the show yet, but have seen the film and thought I&#39;d put some random thoughts out there because I&#39;m occasionally swayed by what Jett and Gareth say. So here goes:</p><p>Terrific fun, was sucked in by the pace, characters and humour.<br />Felt like a very Abrams thing to do by beginning the film with an emotional puch, just like M:I 3, but I fell for it.<br />Was suprised they decided to use material from the last Trek, i.e. Romulan hell bent on revenge driving a huge ship resembling an insect.<br />Why do so many of these films have to deal in HUGE senarios involving planet sized death and the threat of Earth&#39;s total destruction? Just as many thrills can be had on a smaller scale, i.e. Wrath of Khan.<br />Shame about revenge being the motivation of the &#39;bad guy&#39;. Only thing I think let the whole thing down.<br />Did I say how much fun I had?<br />Sorry if you&#39;ve said these things already guys. Had to get these down without being under the influence!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2407</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2407</guid> <description>more thoughts on Star Trek</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more thoughts on Star Trek</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StanleyRumm</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/star-trek-podcast-review/#comment-2406</link> <dc:creator>StanleyRumm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=2088#comment-2406</guid> <description>Good show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe there&#039;s another reason why Star Trek died a death during the Bush era. I&#039;ll have to duck somewhat as I type the following, but I hope to be able to pop my head back out by the end...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Star Trek has always been about spreading the American dream and the American way of life across the world. Its whole philosophy is based on the view/ opinion of the USA as a benevolent, parental, &quot;want to do the right thing&quot;, heart-in-the-right-place-even-if-we-don&#039;t-always-get-it-right, strength-but-doesn&#039;t-push-it-around belief in the innate goodness of America and the American way of life. &lt;br&gt;&quot;We don&#039;t interfere -we just try to help improve&quot; -paraphrasing the Prime Directive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Bush administration proved that idea (amongst those hawks at least) to be farcical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know it&#039;s what made The West Wing unwatchable for me too. It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t believe there have been presidents who had to wrestle with their consciences and come to decisions based on what they believe to be &quot;the right thing&quot;, but W (the Wadministration) made a mockery of that upright reputation and dignity that the US had earned (in most &#039;Western&#039; people&#039;s minds at least).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Wadministration was like the Federation was suddenly being run by Klingons or Romulans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe Obama is setting the USA on the path to begin to restore that reputation, but it will take a long time. Movies like this new Star Trek will help in that cause.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Live long and prosper. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good show.</p><p>I believe there&#39;s another reason why Star Trek died a death during the Bush era. I&#39;ll have to duck somewhat as I type the following, but I hope to be able to pop my head back out by the end&#8230;</p><p>Star Trek has always been about spreading the American dream and the American way of life across the world. Its whole philosophy is based on the view/ opinion of the USA as a benevolent, parental, &#8220;want to do the right thing&#8221;, heart-in-the-right-place-even-if-we-don&#39;t-always-get-it-right, strength-but-doesn&#39;t-push-it-around belief in the innate goodness of America and the American way of life. <br />&#8220;We don&#39;t interfere -we just try to help improve&#8221; -paraphrasing the Prime Directive.</p><p>The Bush administration proved that idea (amongst those hawks at least) to be farcical.</p><p>I know it&#39;s what made The West Wing unwatchable for me too. It&#39;s not that I don&#39;t believe there have been presidents who had to wrestle with their consciences and come to decisions based on what they believe to be &#8220;the right thing&#8221;, but W (the Wadministration) made a mockery of that upright reputation and dignity that the US had earned (in most &#39;Western&#39; people&#39;s minds at least).</p><p>The Wadministration was like the Federation was suddenly being run by Klingons or Romulans.</p><p>I believe Obama is setting the USA on the path to begin to restore that reputation, but it will take a long time. Movies like this new Star Trek will help in that cause.</p><p>Live long and prosper. ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: thefilmtalk.com @ 2012-05-22 12:16:00 -->
