<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Gene Siskel &#8211; Gone These 10 Years Now</title> <atom:link href="http://thefilmtalk.com/2009/02/20/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1734</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:22:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1734</guid> <description>Don&#039;t feel silly Peter - I understand the Michael Phelps is indeed doing a film review show, but he only reviews pics that are swim related...so he&#039;s reviewed Burt Lancaster in &#039;The Swimmer&#039;, Kevin Spacey in &#039;Swimming with Sharks&#039;, &#039;Swimfan&#039; etc. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t feel silly Peter &#8211; I understand the Michael Phelps is indeed doing a film review show, but he only reviews pics that are swim related&#8230;so he&#39;s reviewed Burt Lancaster in &#39;The Swimmer&#39;, Kevin Spacey in &#39;Swimming with Sharks&#39;, &#39;Swimfan&#39; etc. ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1733</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:15:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1733</guid> <description>Doh, I meant Michael Phillips, gosh I feel stupid.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, I meant Michael Phillips, gosh I feel stupid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1732</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1732</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t like Roeper at first, but compared to Ben Lyons (who they have now), he&#039;s like the all-knowing movie god. I actually really like Michael Phelps too, and I had really hoped the show would live on as Phelps and Roeper but disney had other plans. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, have you guys heard that Ebert recently mentioned on his blog that he and Roeper are going to be returning to tv soon with a new show? I can&#039;t imagine Ebert can be on the show because of his surgury&#039;s (he can&#039;t speak), so I&#039;m not sure exactly what their planning, but its worth looking out for.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t like Roeper at first, but compared to Ben Lyons (who they have now), he&#39;s like the all-knowing movie god. I actually really like Michael Phelps too, and I had really hoped the show would live on as Phelps and Roeper but disney had other plans.</p><p>By the way, have you guys heard that Ebert recently mentioned on his blog that he and Roeper are going to be returning to tv soon with a new show? I can&#39;t imagine Ebert can be on the show because of his surgury&#39;s (he can&#39;t speak), so I&#39;m not sure exactly what their planning, but its worth looking out for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1736</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:53:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1736</guid> <description>yeah i&#039;ve always enjoyed mark kermode - (seeing him on late night review, etc.) though i don&#039;t find his analysis always spot on, or penetrative enough he&#039;s always good value</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i&#39;ve always enjoyed mark kermode &#8211; (seeing him on late night review, etc.) though i don&#39;t find his analysis always spot on, or penetrative enough he&#39;s always good value</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Hollies</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1735</link> <dc:creator>Joe Hollies</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:44:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1735</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s fair to say that my own Siskel and Ebert are Simon Mayo and Mark Kermode, although I do like listening to you two as well.  I had only truely gotten into S&amp;E about a year ago through the online archives (I had a gap year before starting my Film Studies course).  If anyone would ask me &#039;Siskel or Ebert&#039;, I think I have soft spot for Siskel, though isn&#039;t Ebert the more popular one?  Even Richard Roeper&#039;s grown on me a little (having not liked his giving Wallace and Gromit &#039;Thumbs Down&#039;).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s fair to say that my own Siskel and Ebert are Simon Mayo and Mark Kermode, although I do like listening to you two as well.  I had only truely gotten into S&#038;E about a year ago through the online archives (I had a gap year before starting my Film Studies course).  If anyone would ask me &#39;Siskel or Ebert&#39;, I think I have soft spot for Siskel, though isn&#39;t Ebert the more popular one?  Even Richard Roeper&#39;s grown on me a little (having not liked his giving Wallace and Gromit &#39;Thumbs Down&#39;).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1737</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:29:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1737</guid> <description>yeah - usually Ebert has something interesting to say - even if it&#039;s only tangentially about the pic.+ yeah i think siskel kept him honest! ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah &#8211; usually Ebert has something interesting to say &#8211; even if it&#39;s only tangentially about the pic.+ yeah i think siskel kept him honest! ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1731</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:22:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1731</guid> <description>Don&#039;t feel silly Peter - I understand the Michael Phelps is indeed doing a film review show, but he only reviews pics that are swim related...so he&#039;s reviewed Burt Lancaster in &#039;The Swimmer&#039;, Kevin Spacey in &#039;Swimming with Sharks&#039;, &#039;Swimfan&#039; etc. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t feel silly Peter &#8211; I understand the Michael Phelps is indeed doing a film review show, but he only reviews pics that are swim related&#8230;so he&#39;s reviewed Burt Lancaster in &#39;The Swimmer&#39;, Kevin Spacey in &#39;Swimming with Sharks&#39;, &#39;Swimfan&#39; etc. ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1730</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1730</guid> <description>Doh, I meant Michael Phillips, gosh I feel stupid.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, I meant Michael Phillips, gosh I feel stupid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1729</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1729</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t like Roeper at first, but compared to Ben Lyons (who they have now), he&#039;s like the all-knowing movie god. I actually really like Michael Phelps too, and I had really hoped the show would live on as Phelps and Roeper but disney had other plans. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, have you guys heard that Ebert recently mentioned on his blog that he and Roeper are going to be returning to tv soon with a new show? I can&#039;t imagine Ebert can be on the show because of his surgury&#039;s (he can&#039;t speak), so I&#039;m not sure exactly what their planning, but its worth looking out for.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t like Roeper at first, but compared to Ben Lyons (who they have now), he&#39;s like the all-knowing movie god. I actually really like Michael Phelps too, and I had really hoped the show would live on as Phelps and Roeper but disney had other plans.</p><p>By the way, have you guys heard that Ebert recently mentioned on his blog that he and Roeper are going to be returning to tv soon with a new show? I can&#39;t imagine Ebert can be on the show because of his surgury&#39;s (he can&#39;t speak), so I&#39;m not sure exactly what their planning, but its worth looking out for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/roger-ebert-remembers-gene-siskel-10-years/#comment-1728</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=478#comment-1728</guid> <description>yeah i&#039;ve always enjoyed mark kermode - (seeing him on late night review, etc.) though i don&#039;t find his analysis always spot on, or penetrative enough he&#039;s always good value</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i&#39;ve always enjoyed mark kermode &#8211; (seeing him on late night review, etc.) though i don&#39;t find his analysis always spot on, or penetrative enough he&#39;s always good value</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: thefilmtalk.com @ 2012-05-22 10:10:31 -->
