<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Cinema is Dead &#8211; Long Live Cinema!</title> <atom:link href="http://thefilmtalk.com/2008/09/02/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jett Loe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-549</link> <dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-549</guid> <description>HiDef vs. Stills</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HiDef vs. Stills</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kiley</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-547</link> <dc:creator>kiley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:21:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-547</guid> <description>The next step in cinema&#039;s evolution?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next step in cinema&#39;s evolution?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-548</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-548</guid> <description>I was told there would be no math....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn&#039;t the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told there would be no math&#8230;.</p><p>As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn&#39;t the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jettloe</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-546</link> <dc:creator>jettloe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-546</guid> <description>HiDef vs. Stills</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HiDef vs. Stills</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kiley</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-545</link> <dc:creator>kiley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:21:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-545</guid> <description>The next step in cinema&#039;s evolution?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next step in cinema&#39;s evolution?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.com/blog/cinema-is-dead-long-live-cinema/#comment-544</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:18:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=146#comment-544</guid> <description>I was told there would be no math....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn&#039;t the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told there would be no math&#8230;.</p><p>As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn&#39;t the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: thefilmtalk.com @ 2012-02-08 12:53:37 -->
